University–Industry Collaboration Playbook

FAU Intellectual Property & Commercialization Checklist

Interactive negotiation checklist featuring policy tooltips, copy-ready sample contract wording, target negotiation timelines, executive readiness reporting, and light/dark mode support.

Overall Negotiation Readiness 0 / 7 Critical Dealbreakers Resolved
0 / 0 Completed (0%)
πŸ’‘ Hover ? for policy rationale Β· Click Sample Clause for copyable contract text
Execution Roadmap

Recommended Collaboration & Contracting Timeline

Complete Phases 1–5 prior to code or dataset transfer
Weeks 1–2 Β· Pre-Meeting
Background IP & Counsel

Compile Background IP Schedule, audit 3rd-party model licenses, retain IP counsel.

Week 3 Β· Discovery
FAU Alignment Session

Review Q1–Q6 with FAU PI, Sponsored Programs, and Office of Tech Development.

Weeks 4–6 Β· Term Sheet
IP & Commercial Terms

Lock Option A/B, model weight allocation, exclusive field, and royalty caps.

Weeks 7–8 Β· Execution
Formal MRA / SRA Signing

Execute Master/Sponsored Research Agreement with 12 mandatory clauses.

Ongoing Β· Publication Gate
30–90 Day Review Window

Pre-publication manuscript review (30–60d) + patent filing hold (up to 90d).

Phase 1 Β· Pre-Meeting Baseline Target: Weeks 1–2

1. Background IP Inventory & Pre-Existing Assets

0/0
Critical
Why This Matters
Creates an indisputable evidentiary baseline before sharing code or models. Without a dated schedule, pre-existing proprietary architectures can become entangled with jointly developed research IP.

Catalog every existing software platform, LLM architecture, model weight set, algorithm, dataset, training material, prompt workflow, and proprietary infrastructure your organization brings.

Negotiation Principle
Prevents implied assignment or encumbrance of pre-existing commercial assets simply because they are utilized during a collaborative study.

Ensure neither party acquires ownership of pre-existing IP, patents, trade secrets, or academic methodologies brought into the collaboration.

Stakeholder Tip
Public universities in Florida operate under state statutory mandates and Board of Governors rules. Specialized counsel ensures commercial terms survive university legal review.

Review FAU's published Intellectual Property Policy, Contract Services IP Guidance, and Sponsored Programs agreement templates prior to signing.

Phase 2 Β· Ownership Architecture Target: Weeks 4–6

2. Project IP Allocation & FAU Policy Safeguards

0/0
Critical
FAU Policy Trap
FAU Contract Services guidance states a preference for 50/50 joint ownership with an option to license FAU's half. Under US law, joint patent owners and joint copyright owners face conflicting rules on accounting for profits, enforcement, and exclusive sublicensing.

Negotiate ownership allocation based on actual inventive/authorship contributions and separate commercial licensing rather than treating the entire resulting system as one jointly owned asset.

Critical
FAU Policy Risk
Under FAU's IP Policy, software and copyrightable materials created with university support belong to FAU. If FAU faculty test or adapt your codebase, derivative works could be claimed by FAU unless expressly carved out.

Ensure derivative modifications or enhancements to your core platform track back to your Background IP ownershipβ€”and exclude post-project independent R&D from university claims.

Phase 3 Β· Technical Granularity Target: Weeks 4–6

3. Component-by-Component LLM & AI Allocation

0/0

Do not treat the LLM as one indivisible asset. Verify each technical layer is explicitly assigned in the contract:

LLM / AI Component Recommended Contractual Treatment
Existing Foundation Models Ownership remains with original owner or governed by third-party model license
Existing Code, Algorithms & Architecture Retained exclusively by contributing party (Background IP)
Training & Fine-Tuning Methodologies Retained by contributing party unless specifically co-invented
New Source Code & Evaluation Benchmarks Allocated by authorship, inventorship, and defined SOW contributions
Fine-Tuned Model Weights & Derivatives Explicitly allocated with guaranteed commercial exploitation rights for Partner
Prompts & Proprietary Workflows Retained by originating party; project-only usage license
Critical
AI IP Nuance
Model weights are binary parameter arrays that may not cleanly qualify for patent or copyright protection alone. Contractual allocation of weights and inference/deployment rights is essential.

Ensure that if FAU fine-tunes or optimizes your base architecture, your organization holds unrestricted commercial rights to deploy, host, and monetize the resulting weights.

Data Leakage Prevention
Prevents proprietary customer data, curated corpora, or synthetic evaluation datasets from being retained by faculty labs to train future unrelated models.

Define permitted preprocessing, whether FAU can retain contributed or synthetic datasets after project completion, and prohibit training external models on your proprietary data.

Phase 4 Β· Monetization & Exclusivity Target: Weeks 4–6

4. Commercialization Rights & Licensing Terms

0/0
Critical
Strategic Structure
Option A gives you clean platform ownership + exclusive commercial license to joint IP. Option B accommodates strict university ownership mandates via a pre-agreed worldwide exclusive license with full sublicensing rights.

Option A: Partner owns the commercial platform + receives an exclusive commercial license to jointly developed IP in an agreed field; FAU retains non-commercial research/teaching rights.
Option B: FAU owns university-created IP where policy-mandated, paired with a pre-negotiated, worldwide exclusive commercial license to Partner.

Critical
Leverage Warning
Once your capital and engineering team build a working commercial system, your negotiating leverage drops sharply. Never accept an unpriced "option to negotiate in good faith later."

Define field of use, worldwide territory, duration, royalty/fee caps, maintenance obligations, and post-termination survival upfront in the initial agreement.

Phase 5 Β· Governance & Contracting Target: Weeks 7–8

5. Publications, Third-Party Compliance & Formal Agreement

0/0
Academic Balance
Universities require publication freedom for faculty/students, while public disclosure destroys foreign patent novelty and exposes trade secrets. A 30–60 day review + up to 90-day patent filing hold satisfies both sides.

Allow FAU academic publication while requiring advance manuscript review, removal of confidential trade secrets/source code, and temporary delay for patent filing.

Clean Chain of Title
Ensures no copyleft (AGPL/GPL) dependencies, restrictive foundation model licenses (e.g., non-commercial weights), or undisclosed federal grant Bayh-Dole obligations taint your commercial product.

Document all third-party licenses and verify whether any federal funding triggers Bayh-Dole reporting or march-in rights.

Critical

Do not rely on an NDA or general MOU. Coordinate with FAU Sponsored Programs & Office of Technology Development to incorporate all 12 core clauses (Scope, Background IP Schedules, Project IP, Commercial Rights, Licensing, Improvements, Confidentiality, Data Rights, Publications, Royalties, Termination Survival, and Enforcement).

Phase 6 Β· Discovery Agenda Target: Week 3

6. Initial Meeting Questions to Align With FAU

0/0
Copied to clipboard!